‘Armed in America’ historian defends collective rights interpretation of Second Amendment – Patriot Gun News
— Read on patriotgunnews.com/2018/03/13/armed-in-america-historian-defends-collective-rights-interpretation-of-second-amendment/
-
Join 354 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
- Pro-2A group sues Oregon over out-of-state permit recognition
- Man justifiably kills shooter in self-defense, still gets punished by blue state anyways
- Three federal cases test whether Colorado treats gun rights as policy or as a limit on government – Rocky Mountain Voice
- Georgetown professor’s gun survey finds 2.2 million defensive uses | Fox News
- Massachusetts fails to get suit tossed over delayed gun permits
Twitter Updates
Tweets by 2AmendRightorgMonthly Archives
Categories
2nd Amendment, Shooting & Firearms Blog 
Reblogged this on and commented:
Referenced or not, the Second Amendment is written as it is, for specific reasons and purposes. It remains twenty-seven words concluding with, “Shall not be infringed [PERIOD!].”
Any, and/or all, form of restrictions, permits, licensing, is unlawful and in violation of the Bill of Rights. Unless of course, we bring back slavery, end women voting, and so forth. But that would rub many, the wrong way, indeed.